The recipe I rewrite before cooking it
A personal essay on the habit of rewriting every recipe in my own shorthand before I cook it, and why doing it slow on paper makes everything faster in the…

There's a habit I picked up about three years ago that I think about almost every time I cook. Before I make a dish I haven't made before, I rewrite the recipe by hand on a piece of paper, in my own shorthand, in the order I'm actually going to do things. The original recipe goes in the recycling. I cook from the rewritten one.
This sounds like the kind of useless ritual that food bloggers love to recommend. It isn't. It changed everything about how I cook.
Recipes, as they're typically written, are organized for the writer, not the cook. They start with a paragraph of why-we-love-this-dish copy, then ingredients in a sterile list, then instructions in numbered steps that often skip back and forth in time. "Meanwhile, blanch the asparagus." "Earlier, prepare the breadcrumbs." "While the chicken rests, make the pan sauce." The cook is asked to mentally rearrange the recipe in real time, while also actually cooking it. It's a working-memory problem the recipe doesn't help with.
When I rewrite a recipe, I do the mental rearrangement on paper first. Everything that has to start cold goes at the top. Everything that has to be done right before plating goes at the bottom. Wait times are explicit blocks on the page. I write down the active duration and the inactive duration of every step. By the time I'm done, the rewritten recipe looks more like a kitchen timeline than a recipe. It's also usually about a third of the length.
The first time I did this was for a beef bourguignon that had defeated me twice before. The original recipe was Julia Child's, which is famously thorough and also famously hard to cook from because it's organized as prose. I rewrote it in my own shorthand on a single page and produced the best version I'd made by a wide margin. Not because the technique was different. Because the timing was suddenly clear. I knew when the wine had to start reducing. I knew when to peel the pearl onions. I knew when to start the lardons. None of that was different from what Julia had written. It was just no longer scattered across three pages of recipe.
I started doing this for everything. A weeknight pasta. A roast chicken. A loaf of bread. The rewriting takes me about five minutes per recipe. The savings in the kitchen are between fifteen and forty-five minutes, depending on the complexity of the dish, and the rate at which I mess things up drops dramatically. Most cooking mistakes are timing mistakes. The pan-sauce step starts thirty seconds late because the cook didn't see it coming. The pasta water never gets salted because it was on a different page of the printout. The bread proofs forty-five minutes too long because the cook went back to the original recipe and reread the wrong line. None of those are technique failures. They're sequencing failures.
The thing rewriting forces me to do is read the recipe like an engineer instead of a reader. I notice the assumptions the recipe makes. I notice when a recipe asks me to do two things at once and doesn't acknowledge that two things take more than one set of hands. I notice when the recipe has buried prep work in the ingredient list that should have been in the instructions. Most published recipes are full of these. The reader doesn't see them because the recipe was written and edited by people who weren't doing them in real time.
The deeper benefit is that by the time I start cooking, I already know the dish. I'm not discovering it as I go. The rewritten recipe is a map I made. The original recipe was someone else's map, and I was trying to navigate by it while walking. Those are different cognitive tasks.
I think about restaurant kitchens here too. A line cook never reads a recipe during service. They've internalized the dish well before the first customer arrives. The internalization is the point of prep. Most home cooks try to do the prep and the reading and the cooking simultaneously, which is a recipe for chaos, and then they blame their lack of "talent" or "intuition" when it doesn't go well. The cooks who look talented are usually just the ones who did the homework. The rewriting is the homework.
If you take one thing from this site and apply it to your own cooking, I'd suggest the rewriting habit. It's free. It works for any recipe. It takes five minutes. And it'll do more for you than any new pan, any new knife, any new ingredient.
The recipe is the easy part. The reading is the hard part.
— C.R.
Share this article

